Kha

The hieroglyphic
name of Kha
Kha was an official of the Eighteenth Dynasty. He  attended Amenhotep II (1427-1401  B.C.E.) and his two successors, Tuthmosis iv (1401-1391  B.C.E.) and Amenhotep III (1391-1353 B.C.E.). Kha was an architect involved in mortuary complexes for the royal homes. He was forgotten at Thebes.

The Tomb of Kha (TT8):

Scene of the gilded inner coffin of  Kha
TT8 was the tomb of Kha, the superintendent of works from Deir el-Medina in the mid-18th dynasty and his married woman, Merit. The New Kingdom tomb was one of the super archaeological discoveries of ancient Egypt, one of few tombs of aristocracy to survive intact. It was saw by Arthur Weigall and Ernesto Schiaparelli in 1906 on behalf of the Italian Archaeological Mission. Its spotters used 250 doers to dig in pursuit of the tomb for several weeks. The pyramid-chapel of Kha and Merit was already known for many years; settings from the chapel had already been simulated in the 19th century by different Egyptologists, including John Gardiner Wilkinson and Karl Lepsius. Egyptologists likewise knew that Kha was an serious foreman at Deir El-Medina, where he was trusted for projects made during the reigns Amenhotep II, Thutmose IV and Amenhotep III. The pyramidion of the chapel had been removed by an earlier visitor and was in the Louvre Museum.

Location of TT
Plan of TT8
Schiaparelli was stunned to discover the tomb in the separate cliffs immediate the village and not in the immediate propinquity of the chapel itself, as was conventionally the case for other burials of Egyptian nobility. The items saw in the tomb show that Kha and Merit were quite comfortable during their lifetime. Unlike the more broken burial of Tutankhamun, the burials of Kha and Merit were carefully planned out. Heavy items were addressed by dust planes and the floor was swept by the last someone to leave the tomb.

The coffins of Kha and Merit were entombed in two nested coffins; Kha's mummy was tightly wrapped and different items of jewelry were included within the wrappings. The two weak coffins of Kha are greatest examples of the wealthiness and technically grand craftsmanship of the arts during the rule of Amenhotep III. Kha's outer coffin "was addressed with black bitumen, with the face, hands, substitute stripes of the wigging, bands of inscriptions and figures of funerary gods [all] in gilded gesso. Accepted in one of Kha's coffins is one of the earliest exercises of the Egyptian Book of the Dead. An x-ray of Kha's mummy shows that it was "adorned with a gold necklace and heavy earrings, one of the earliest examples yet found of men enduring earrings."

Balance scale from the tomb of Kha (Torino)

Merit was buried in a various out coffin with one inner anthropoid coffin and a cartonnage mask. Her mummy was loosely white with funerary jewellery. A tomb of this magnitude would have taken years to check, a process that Kha certainly managed during his lifetime. Accidentally predeceased by Merit, Kha donated his hold coffin to his wife. Since it was too big for Merits mummy, Kha was drawn to pack linens, monogrammed for him, about her mummy. Merit's single coffin combines has of Kha's inner and outer coffins; "the lid is only gilded, but the box is addressed with black bitumen, with only the figures and letterings gilded." Both Kha's and Merit's human coffins were held within Middle Kingdom style "rectangular outer coffins covered with black bitumen and having vaulted, gable-ended lids." Kha's coffin was risen on sledge runners, notes Ernesto Schiaparelli in his 1927 publication report of the discovery.

The tomb was supplied with all the objects necessary in the afterlife. Ointments and kohl were regarded as a essential part of hygiene and these precious cloths were held in a variety of topped alabaster, glass and faience watercraft. Egyptians retained themselves from flies and from sun by hard dark kohl under the eyes, depicted as a long cosmetic stripe on sculptures. Other objects in the tomb include sandals, jar vessels and more than 100 garments. All the funerary objects from Kha's tomb, except for two small articles, were later transferred to the Egyptian museum in Turin. Tomb TT8 was discovered at almost the same time as KV55 and less than two years after KV46, the tomb of Yuya and Tjuyu, which held almost the same contents as TT8 and dated to only slenderly later in the reign of Amenhotep III.

Recent Posts:


·        Keper
·        Masaharta
·        Nebseni Papyrus
·        Kerma
·        The Kingdom of Kush
·        Adule
·        Masara
·        Kewab
·        Nebt
·        Afnet

Afnet

Afnet is a head covering shown on the goddesses selket and Isis and on a statue of King Tutankhamun (1333-1323 B.C.E.), saw in his tomb. The afnet like the nemes, the royal headdress, but was not checked and lacked the front gores. Its use was probable restricted to royalty or to the pictures of divine organisms, although common men and nobles likewise wore a similar head cover.

Recent Posts:


·        Keper
·        Masaharta
·        Nebseni Papyrus
·        Kerma
·        The Kingdom of Kush
·        Adule
·        Masara
·        Kewab
·        Nebt

Nebt

Nebt was the princess of Eleventh Dynasty, Middle Kingdom, c. 2050 BC. A noblewoman of considerable agency and status, Nebt was the inheritress of estates on Elephantine Island, at Aswan in the far south of Egypt. She was a patronne of the arts and held a band of scholars in her help. Her girl, who shared her interests and who established an serious collecting of forms of art, was one of  the  wives  of  King Nebhepetre Montuhotep II.

Recent Posts:


·        Keper
·        Masaharta
·        Nebseni Papyrus
·        Kerma
·        The Kingdom of Kush
·        Adule
·        Masara
·        Kewab

Kewab

The hieroglyphic
 name of Kewab
Kewab was a prince of the Fourth Dynasty, perchance murdered by a rival heir to the toilet. He was a son of Khufu (Cheops; 2551-2528 B.C.E.) and Queen  Meritites (1) and the designated  heir to the throne. Kewab  married  Hetepheres (2), a royal inheritrix. They had a girl, Merysankh (3) and other children. Kewab died suddenly, perchance the victim of an assassination, as the royal family was composed of two various factions at the time.

The sarcophagus of Kewab
He was drawn as a heavy man in Queen Merysankhs tomb a site disciplined for her mother and given to her when she died at a comparatively young age. Kewab was forgot in a mastaba close the great Pyramid of Khufu. His mortuary craze was frequent in Memphis, and in the New Kingdom (1550-1070 B.C.E.), Prince Khaemweset (1), a boy of Ramses II, fixed Kewab's statue.

Recent Posts:


·        Avaris
·        Admonitions of Ipuwer
·        Keper
·        Masaharta
·        Nebseni Papyrus
·        Kerma
·        The Kingdom of Kush
·        Adule
·        Masara 

Masara

Masara is a sacred quarry site, the modern El-Masara, opposite Zawiet el-Aryan, Masara  was  excavate extensively  by Amenhotep I (1525-1504  B.C.E.),  who  used the  stone  for  his  great  making  programs,  taken early in the 18th Dynasty. Limestone from Masara was  transported  to Thebes for  the  temple of Ptah and Amun at Opet. The limestone from this pit was particularly frequent as a facing for repositories because of its lustrous peach.

Recent Posts:


·        Avaris
·        Admonitions of Ipuwer
·        Keper
·        Masaharta
·        Nebseni Papyrus
·        Kerma
·        The Kingdom of Kush
·        Adule

Adule

Adule is a situation on the Red Sea good Massawa, Adule was applied as a hunting reason for wild elephants by Ptolemy II Philadelphus (285-246 B.C.E.) and Ptolemy III Euergetes (246-221 B.C.E.). Adule and other nearly areas on the shores of the Red Sea were occupied by the Egyptians over the centuries, last becoming trade focuses for goods strange from many deep lands and linked to known trade routes  running to the Nile.

Recent Posts:


·        Nebetu
·        Adicran (589-570 B.C.E.)
·        Kenbet
·        Marriage in Ancient Egypt
·        Love in Ancient Egypt
·        kenken-ur
·        Nebireyeraw
·        Avaris
·        Admonitions of Ipuwer
·        Keper
·        Masaharta
·        Nebseni Papyrus
·        Kerma
·        The Kingdom of Kush

The Kingdom of Kush

The hieroglyphic name of Kush
The Kingdom of Kush
The Kingdom of Kush was an ancient kingdom in Nubia, relocated at the meetings of the Blue Nile, White Nile and River Atbara in what are nowadays Sudan and South Sudan. The Kushite era of rule in Nubia was established after the Bronze Age collapse and the disintegration of the New Kingdom of Egypt. Kush was focused at Napata during its early form. After King Kashta ("the Kushite") infested Egypt in the 8th century BC, the Kushite emperors subject for a century as pharaohs of the 25th dynasty of Egypt, until they were released by the Assyrians under the rule of Esarhaddon. During received antiquity, the Kushite imperial capital was situated at Meroe. In early Greek geography, the Meroitic kingdom was noted as Aethiopia. The Kushite kingdom with its capital at Meroe ran until the 4th century AD, when it broken and decomposed due to internal rebellion. The place was eventually conquered and burnt to the soil by the Kingdom of Aksum. The name Kush, since at least the time of Josephus, has been connected with the biblical reference Cush, in the Hebrew Bible  son of Ham (Genesis 10:6). Ham had 4 sons named: Cush, Put, Canaan and Mizraim (Hebrew name for Egypt). According to the Bible, Nimrod, a son of Cush, was the give and king of Babylon, Erech, Akkad and Calneh, in Shinar (Gen 10:10). The Bible also makes address to someone described Cush who is a Benjamite (Psalms 7:1, KJV).

The ruins of Kush
The Pyramids of Meroe
Some contemporary scholars, such as Friedrich Delitzsch, have advised that the biblical Cush might be engaged to the Kassites of the Zagros Mountains (modern Iran). Mentuhotep II (21st century BC give of the Middle Kingdom) is shown to have undertaken military campaigns against Kush in the 29th and 31st years of his reign. This is the earliest Egyptian character to Kush; the Nubian part had gone by other names in the Old Kingdom. During the New Kingdom of Egypt, Nubia (Kush) was an Egyptian dependency, from the 16th century BC ordered by an Egyptian Viceroy of Kush. With the annihilation of the New Kingdom around 1070 BC, Kush became an individual kingdom centered at Napata in modern northern Sudan.

The Kushites buried their monarchs on with all their courtiers in mass tombs. Archaeologists refer to these practices as the "Pan-grave culture". This was established its name due to the way in which the remains are buried. They would dig a pit and put stones round them in a circle. Kushites also built burial mounds and pyramids, and widespread some of the same gods idolized in Egypt, especially Amun and Isis. With the idolizing of these gods the Kushites got to take some of the names of the deities as their throne names. The Kush rulers were took to be guardians of the state religion and were trusted for observing the puts up of the gods. Some scholars think the economy in the Kingdom of Kush was a redistributive system. The state would gather taxes in the form of surplus get and would redistribute to the people. Others think that most of the society worked on the land and essential nothing from the state and did not put up to the state. Northern Kush seemed to be more productive and wealthier than the Southern area.

Under Tuthmosis I, Egypt made several campaigns south.This finally resulted in their appropriation of Nubia circa 1504 BC. After the seduction, Kerma culture was increasingly Egyptianized, yet rebellions extended for 220 years until c.1300 BC. During the New Kingdom, Nubia yet became a key province of the Egyptian Empire, economically, politically and spiritually. So, major Pharonic ceremonies were held at Jebel Barkal near Napata. The royal lineages of the two regions also seem to have intermarried. The extent of cultural/political continuity between the Kerma culture and the chronologically future Kingdom of Kush is difficult to shape. The more Egyptianized Kingdom of Kush egressed, possibly from Kerma, and regained the region's independency from Egypt. The latter polity began to emerge around 1000 BCE, 500 years afterwards the end of the Kingdom of Kerma. Initially, the Kushite kings covered to use Kerma for royal burying and special ceremonials, pointing to some connection. Moreover, the layout of royal funerary intensifies in both Kerma and Napata (the Kush capital) are similarly fashioned. Caches of statues of Kush's pharaohs have as well been saw at Kerma, indicating that the Napatan rulers accepted a historic link between their capital and Kerma.

Dental trait analysis of dodos dating from the Meroitic period in Semna, Nubia, learned that they were close related to Afroasiatic-speaking universes inhabiting the Nile Valley, Horn of Africa, Maghreb and Canary Islands. The Meroitic frames and these ancient and recent fossils were also phenotypically distinct from those belonging to recent Niger-Congo, Nilo-Saharan and Khoisan-speaking universes in Sub-Saharan Africa, as well as from the Mesolithic period denizens of Jebel Sahaba in Nubia. Resistance to the early 18th Dynasty Egyptian rule by neighboring Kush is established in the compositions of Ahmose, an Egyptian warrior who processed under Nebpehtrya Ahmose (1539-1514 BC), Djeserkara Amenhotep I (1514-1493 BC) and Aakheperkara Thutmose I (1493-1481 BC). At the end of the Second Intermediate Period (mid sixteenth century BC), Egypt presented the twin existential threatsthe Hyksos in the North and the Kushites in the South. Taken from the autobiographic inscriptions on the walls of his tomb-chapel, the Egyptians attempted campaigns to frustration Kush and capture Nubia under the rule of Djeserkara Amenhotep I (1514-1493 BC). In Ahmose's writings, the Kushites are described as bowmen, "Now after his Majesty had slain the Bedoin of Asia, he sailed upstream to Upper Nubia to demolish the Nubian bowmen." The tomb writings hold two other references to the Nubian bowmen of Kush.

Egypt's international prestige had declined substantially towards the end of the Third Intermediate Period. Its historical allies, the Semitic Canaanites of the South Levant, had come to the Middle Assyrian Empire (1365-1020 BC), and then the renewed Neo Assyrian Empire (935-605 BC). The Semitic Assyrians, from the 10th century BC ahead, had once more inflated from their northern Mesopotamian motherland, and subdued a great empire, taking on the whole of the Near East, and much of Asia Minor, the eastern Mediterranean, the Caucasus and ancient Persia.

In 945 BC, Sheshonq I and Libyan princes took charge of the Ancient Egyptian delta and founded the funny Libyan or Bubastite dynasty, which would prevail for some 200 years. Sheshonq also won control of southern Egypt by setting his family members in essential priestly positions. In 711, King Sheshonq made Memphis his northern capital. However, Libyan control began to erode as a match dynasty in the delta broken in Leontopolis and Kushites threatened from the south. Alara based the Napatan, or 25th, Kushite dynasty at Napata in Nubia, now Sudan.. Alara's heir Kashta gone Kushite control north to Elephantine and Thebes in Upper Egypt. Kashta's successor Piye captured control of Lower Egypt around 727 BC creating the 25th dynasty of Egypt. This continued until about 671 BC when they were swore by the Neo-Assyrian Empire.

Why the Kushites took to enter Egypt at this crucial point of foreign domination is subject to debate. Archaeologist Timothy Kendall provides his own suppositions, connecting it to a claim of legitimacy linked with Gebel Barkal. Kendall names the Victory Stele of Piye at Gebel Barkal, which countries that "Amun of Napata allotted me to be ruler of each foreign country," and "Amun in Thebes allotted me to be swayer of the Black Land (Kmt)". Reported to Kendall, "foreign lands" in this consider seems to accept Lower Egypt while "Kmt" seems to refer to a united Upper Egypt and Nubia.

Piye was defeated by the Assyrian king Shalmaneser V and then his heir Sargon II in the 720's BC. Piye's son Taharqa enjoyed some minor initial winner in his attempts to regain Egyptian work in the Near East. He aided King Hezekiah from attempt by Sennacherib and the Assyrians (2 Kings 19:9; Isaiah 37:9), nonetheless disease among the surrounding Assyrian army looks to have been the main cause of bankruptcy to take Jerusalem rather than any military setback, and Assyrian records argue Hezekiah was forced to pay tribute. The Assyrian King Sennacherib then undone Taharqa and drove the Nubians and Egyptians from the region and back over the Sinai into Egypt.

The Nubian pyramids
The power of the 25th Dynasty reached a climax under Taharqa. The Nile valley empire was as important as it had been since the New Kingdom. New prosperity revived Egyptian culture. Religion, the arts, and architecture were rejuvenated to their grand Old, Middle, and New Kingdom forms. The Nubian pharaohs developed or reconstructed temples and monuments throughout the Nile valley, letting in Memphis, Karnak, Kawa, and Jebel Barkal. It was during the 25th dynasty that the Nile valley saw the first widespread structure of pyramids (many in modern Sudan) since the Middle Kingdom. Writing was inserted to Kush in the form of the Egyptian-influenced Meroitic script circa 700600 BC, although it looks to have been wholly restricted to the royal court and older temples. Between 674 and 671 BC the Assyrians, tiring of Egyptian invasive, began their invasion of Egypt under King Esarhaddon, the replacement of Sennacherib. Assyrian armies had been the greatest in the world since the 14th century BC, and suppressed this great territory with startling speed. Taharqa was determined from power by Esarhaddon, and fled to his Nubian motherland. Esarhaddon reports "installing local kings and governors" and "All Ethiopians I conducted from Egypt, giving not one to do homage to me".

However, the native Egyptian liege rulers installed by Esarhaddon as puppets were unable to effectively retain full control for long without Assyrian aid. Two years later, Taharqa given from Nubia and seized control of a segment of southern Egypt as far north as Memphis from Esarhaddon's local vassals. Esarhaddon prepared to return to Egypt and once more exclude Taharqa, yet he fell ill and died in his capital Nineveh, before he gave Assyria. His heir, Ashurbanipal, sent a Turtanu (general) with a close but well taken army which once more defeated Taharqa and ejected him from Egypt, and he was special to flee back to his homeland in Nubia, where he died two years later.

Taharqa's heir Tanutamun defeated to regain Egypt. He successfully defeated Necho, the subject ruler put in by Ashurbanipal, taking Thebes in the shape. The Assyrians, who had a military bearing in the north, then sent a large army southwards. Tantamani was expelled, and the Assyrian army gained Thebes to such an extent it never sincerely recovered. Tantamani was tagged back to Nubia, and never vulnerable the Assyrian Empire again. A native Egyptian ruler, Psammetichus I, was placed on the throne, as a liege of Ashurbanipal. Aspelta went the capital to Mero, well farther south than Napata, possibly in 591 BC. It is also possible that Mero had constantly been the Kushite capital. Historians think that the Kushite rulers may have chosen Mero as their home because, unlike Napata, the region approximately Mero had enough woodlands to supply fuel for iron working. In addition, Kush was no longer qualified on the Nile to trade with the outside world; they could or else transport goods from Mero to the Red Sea seacoast, where Greek merchants were now moving extensively.

The Kushites applied the animal-driven water wheel to increase productiveness and create a surplus, in particular during the Napatan-Meroitic Kingdom. In about 300 BC the move to Mero was made more practiced when the monarchs set about to be buried there, rather of at Napata. One theory is that this comprises the monarchs breaking away from the might of the priests at Napata. Checking to Diodorus Siculus, a Kushite king, "Ergamenes", defied the priests and had them mowed down. This story may refer to the first ruler to be entombed at Mero with a similar name such as Arqamani, who found many years after the royal cemetery was opened at Mero. During this same period, Kushite authority may have extended some 1,500 km along the Nile River valley from the Egyptian frontier in the north to regions far southern of modern Khartoum and credibly also substantial soils to the east and west.

Kushite civilization covered for various centuries. In the Napatan Period Egyptian hieroglyphs were used: at this time writing looks to have been qualified to the court and temples. From the 2nd century BC there was a separate Meroitic writing system. This was an alphabetised script with 23 signs used in a hieroglyphical form (mainly on great art) and in a cursive form. The latter was widely used; so far some 1278 texts using this version are known (Leclant 2000). The script was deciphered by Griffith, but the language behind it is still a problem, with only a few words read by modern scholars. It is not as yet achievable to link the Meroitic language with other known languages. Strabo describes a war with the Romans in the 1st century BC. After the initial triumphs of Kandake (or "Candace") Amanirenas against Roman Egypt, the Kushites were defeated and Napata sacked. Remarkably, the wipeout of the capital of Napata was not a pathogenic blow to the Kushites and did not frighten Candace enough to forbid her from again fascinating in combat with the Roman military. Indeed, it appears that Petronius's attack might have had a revitalizing influence on the kingdom. Just three years later, in 22 BC, a large Kushite force run northward with purpose of attacking Qasr Ibrim.

Alerted to the earliest, Petronius again marched south and managed to reach Qasr Ibrim and pad its defences before the offensive Kushites come. Although the ancient sources give no verbal description of the succeeding battle, we know that at some direct the Kushites sent ambassadors to talk terms a peace settlement with Petronius. By the end of the second campaign, however, Petronius was in no temper to deal further with the Kushites. The Kushites come after in negotiating a peace accord on following terms and trade between the two nations multiplied. Some historians like Theodore Mommsen wrote that in Augustus times Nubia was a viable client state of the Roman Empire. It is achievable that the Roman emperor Nero planned another attempt to conquer Kush before his death in AD 68. Kush began to slice as a power by the 1st or 2nd century AD, sapped by the warfare with the Roman state of Egypt and the descent of its established industries. Christianity got to gain over the old pharaonic faith and by the mid-sixth century AD the Kingdom of Kush was melted.

The Meroitic language was spoken in Mero and the Sudan during the Meroitic period (demonstrated from 300 BC). It became extinct about 400 AD. The language was composed in two forms of the Meroitic alphabet: Meroitic written, which was written with a stylus and was applied for frequent record-keeping; and Meroitic Hieroglyph, which was carved in stone or used for royal or sacred documents. It is not well understood due to the scarcity of bilingual texts. The earliest inscription in Meroitic writing dates from between 180-170 BC. These hieroglyphs were found sliced on the temple of Queen Shanakdakhete. Meroitic Cursive is written horizontally, and shows from outside to left like all Semitic writing systems.

By the 3rd century BC, a new endemic alphabet, the Meroitic, lying in of twenty-three letters, exchanged Egyptian script. The Meroitic script is an alphabetic script primitively derived from Egyptian hieroglyphs which was used to write the Meroitic language of the Kingdom of Mero/Kush. It was developed in the Napatan Period (about 700-300 BC), and first seems in the 2nd century BC. For a time, it was also possibly used to write the Nubian language of the heir Nubian kingdoms. It is variable to which language family the Meroitic language is connected. Claude Rilly has offered that it, like the Nobiin language, belongs to the Eastern Sudanic offset of the Nilo-Saharan family. Kirsty Rowan advises that Meroitic, like the Egyptian language, instead belongs to the Afro-Asiatic family. She bases this on its sound inventory and phonotactics, which are similar to those of the Afro-Asiatic languages and dissimilar from those of the Nilo-Saharan languages.

Sources and References:

Brugsch (H. K.), A History of Egypt Under the Pharaohs: Derived Entirely from the Monuments, to Which Is Added a Discourse On the Exodus of the Israelites, Vol. 2, London, 1879, PP. 215-287.

Brannon (B), Discover the Kingdom of Kush,  Benchmark Education Company, 2005 ,P. 8.

Harkless (N. D.), Nubian Pharaohs and Meroitic Kings: The kingdom of Kush, Bloomington, IN, 2006.


Recent Posts:


·        kenken-ur
·        Nebireyeraw
·        Avaris
·        Admonitions of Ipuwer
·        Keper
·        Masaharta
·        Nebseni Papyrus
·        Kerma

Kerma

The Location of Kerma
in Modern Sudan (Google Maps)
Kerma (also famous as Dukki Gel) was the capital city of the Kerma Culture, which was relocated in present-day Sudan leastwise 5500 years ago. Kerma is one of the broadest archaeological sites in ancient Nubia. It has raised decades of extended minings and research, accepting thousands of graves and tombs and the residential tails of the serious city next the southwestern/Lower Deffufa. Around 3000 BC, a cultural tradition set about round Kerma. It was a essential urban center that was improved some a great adobe temple known as the west Deffufa. As a capital city and position of royal burials, it throws light on the complex social construction present in this society.

Settlement periods:

- Pre-Kerma (3500-2500 BC) No C-Group culture Phase
- Early Kerma (2500-2050 BC) C-Group Phase IaIb
- Middle Kerma (2050-1750 BC) C-Group Phase IbIIa
- Classic Kerma (1750-1580 BC) C-Group Phase IIbIII
- Final Kerma (1580-1500 BC) C-Group Phase IIbIII
- Late Kerma  New Kingdom (1500-1100? BC) New Kingdom

By 1700 BC, Kerma was host to a population of leastwise 10,000 people. Different to those of ancient Egypt in theme and paper, Kerma's artefacts are qualified by extensive amounts of blue faience, which the Kermans disciplined techniques to work with severally of Egypt, and by their work with glazed quartzite and architectural inlays.

Kerma takes a cemetery with over 30,000 graves. The cemetery indicates a general pattern of larger graves ringed by smaller ones, indicating social stratification. The site includes at its southern boundary burial pitchers, with four extending upward of 90 metres (300 feet) in diameter. These are believed to be the graves of the city's net kings, some of which contain motives and artwork reflecting Egyptian gods such as Horus. Generally, influence from Egypt may be kept in numerous burials, particularly with regards to material prove such as pottery and grave goods. For case, Second Intermediate Egyptian ceramics from Avaris, such as Tell el-Yahudiyeh Ware, have been learned within Kerma burying. In addition, artifacts such as scarab seals and amulets are fat, indicating extended trade with ancient Egypt as well as an exchange of cultural ideas. After the firing of Kerma, the cemetery was used to host the kings of the 25th or "Napatan" dynasty of the Kingdom of Kush from Upper (Southern) Nubia.

Early archaeology at Kerma gone with an Egyptian and Sudanese resume made by George A. Reisner, an American with joint appointments at Harvard University and the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. Reisner late led these two institutions, the so-called "Harvard-Boston" expedition during three subject flavours at Kerma (1913-1916). He gone in Egypt and Sudan for 25 years, 1907-1932. As one of the earliest shoes to be excavated in this region, Kerma and Reisners contributions to the regions archaeology are fundamental. A basic chronology of Kerman culture was given based on the work of Reisners Harvard-Boston excursion (1913-1916); this provided the scaffolding for full other determinations in the region. Reisners precise dig techniques, site reports, and other publications made later reinterpretation of his solutions possible.

The Lower/west Deffufa (a essential tomb structure) was saw shorter to the river; the Upper/eastside Deffufa is a few kilometres away from the river in a cemetery. Most burials were slenderly flexed, lying on their slopes. Reisner saw many links to ancient Egyptian culture through architectural techniques and the dimensions of the base of the Lower/western Deffufa (52.3 m  26.7 m, or 150  100 Egyptian cubits).[10] He assumed it was a fort. He did not conduct further minings of the settlement distrusted to environment the Lower Deffuffa.

The Upper/eastside Deffufa was situated amidst thousands of low, heavy graves, with clear stylistic deviations between the northern, middle, and southeastern parts of the graveyard. The most elaborate tombs were learned in the southern part of the cemetery. Reisner assumed that the huge, quadrangular deffufa social systems were funerary chapels associated with the greatest mound tombs, not tombs themselves. He interpreted these located on his knowledge of ancient Egyptian funerary practices, and since many of the grave goods saw were Egyptian, he had no conclude to think other. George A. Reisner fit this archaeology into his seeing of ancient life along the Nile, smart that Kerma was a planet city of the ancient Egyptians. It was not until the late twentieth century that diggings by Charles Bonnet and the University of Geneva stable that this was not the face. They instead exposed a vast independent urban complex that subject most of the Third Cataract for centuries.
The ancient city of Kerma
Nubians Pharaohs

For decades after Reisners excavations, his dismissal of the site as an Egyptian satellite fortified city was accepted. The patient and tolerant work of Bonnet and his colleagues unearthed the foundations of galore houses, workshops, and palaces, proving that as early as 2000 BC Kerma was a significant urban center, presumably the capital city and a burial ground of the kings of Kush. From 1977 to 2003, Bonnet and an global team of scholars excavated at Kerma.

Bonnets Swiss team has situated the coming types of places at Kerma: ancient town, grand tomb, temple, residential/administrative buildings, Napatan buildlings, Napatan potters workshop, Meroitic cemeteries, munitions, and Neolithic grain pits and huts. Among many other special finds, Bonnet revealed a bronze shape in the Kerma important city. It is within the palisades of the religious middle that a bronze shop was developed. The workshop lied of multiple forms and the artisans techniques appear to have been quite elaborate. There is no comparable discovery in Egypt or in Sudan to help us see these rests In 2003, black granite statues of kings of the 25th Dynasty of Egypt were described close Kerma by Charles Bonnet and his archeological team.

Mortuary practice in Kerma various over time, and this is visible in the archeological record. The big cemetery, around the Upper/eastern Deffufa is placed with older graves in the north and more gone (and complex) tombs and tombs in the south part. In the Early Kerma period, 2500-2050 BC, burials are marked by a low, circular super construction of slabs of black sandstone, stuck into the ground in homocentric circles. White quartz pebbles reenforce the structure. Smaller burials are saw next the larger tombs of important individuals. Tombs advance from simple piles to Egyptian bright pyramid complexes. This transition does not begin until long afterwards pyramids are out of mode in Egypt.

Bonnet notes that sacrificial victims come out and become increasingly common in the Middle Kerma period. Because burial chambers can be easily figured, I would question the likelihood of the sacrifice of a wife and/or baby when a man dies, without any ethnohistorical evidence to put up this in this culture. In fact Buzon and Judd head this premise by analyzing traumata and indicators of skeletal emphasis in these sacrificial victims.

Most remains are saw in a lightly contracted or contracted set on their sides. Because of the arid defect climate, natural mummification is very common. Without the normal works of decomposition to skeletonize the body, soft tissue papers, hairs, and organic grave goods are still often got (e.g., textiles, feathers, leather, fingernails). Grave goods accept faience beads, cattle skulls, and clayware. Spare collections, like other archeological evidence, retain to be re-saw and re-interpreted as new explore questions arise. Two recent studies highlight the kinds of questions that bioarchaeologists are involving of the skeletal material situated from Kerma.

Kendall hints that heavy tombs in the Upper Deffufa disciplined the bodies of dozens or hundreds of given victims. A later bioarchaeological examination of gave people from these contextsshowed no significant disputes between the skeletal stress markers of sacrificed versus non-sacrificed individuals. They drew tries out from the sacrificial corridors and sepultures outside of the important tumuli corridors. Accompanying mortals in the tumuli at Kerma are read as wives sacrificed upon the death of the husband, but the bioarchaeological evidence does not keep this archaeological close. A prior study noted no departure in the frequency of painful injury.

Traumatic hurt is saw through the lens of modern traumatic injury patterns. Many aspects of the Kerma injury pattern were comparable to clinical [modern] observations: males had a last frequency of trauma, the middle-aged group showed the most trauma, the earliest age cohort exposed the least amount of raised injuries, a gentle group saw multiple trauma and breaks occurred more frequently than breakdowns or muscle pulls. Parry breaks (often occur when an individual is fending off a snow from an assaulter) are common. These do not necessarily result from round, however, and Judd does know this. She does not role the same parsing strategy when regarding Colles' fractures (of the carpus, usually pass when falling onto ones hands) may result from being affected from a height rather than gregarious violence, and this is not accepted.

Recent Posts:



·        Marriage in Ancient Egypt
·        Love in Ancient Egypt
·        kenken-ur
·        Nebireyeraw
·        Avaris
·        Admonitions of Ipuwer
·        Keper
·        Masaharta
·        Nebseni Papyrus

Nebseni Papyrus

Nebseni Papyrus (British Museum)
Nebseni Papyrus is tuary  text, older  than  the  famed  ani papyrus. Now  in  the  British Museum,  Nebsenis  Papyrus  is  76  bases  long  by  one  foot extended.  It  is  a  mortuary  commemorative  document,  a altered  version  of  the  original,  been  the  Theban varies  of  the  late  periods,  named  a  Recension. The texts involved in the papyrus are sometimes defined in black. An address of the god Horus to his father, the god Osiris, is involved in the text file. The papyrus was discovered in Deir eL-Bahri in 1881.

More about Nebseni Papyrus, Look:



Recent Posts:


·        Marriage in Ancient Egypt
·        Love in Ancient Egypt
·        kenken-ur
·        Nebireyeraw
·        Avaris
·        Admonitions of Ipuwer
·        Keper
·        Masaharta

Masaharta

The hieroglyphic
name of Masaharta
Masaharta or Masaherta was the Full Priest of Amun at Thebes between 1054 and 1045 BC. His father was Pinedjem I, who was the Theban upper Priest of Amun and de facto rule of Upper Egypt from 1070 BC, then express himself pharaoh in 1054 BC and Masaharta come after him as higher priest. His mother was belike Duathathor-Henuttawy, the girl of Ramses XI, last swayer of the 20th dynasty. His aunt Tentamun, another girl of Ramesses married Pharaoh Smendes I, who ruled Lower Egypt. One of Masaharta's brothers was Psusennes I, who was Smendes's successor, the passing Amenemnisu as pharaoh.

His wife is coming to have been the Singer of Amun Tayuheret, whose mummy was saw in the Deir el-Bahri cachette. It is manageable that he had a girl addressed Isetemkheb, since a lady by this name is addressed the girl of a higher priest on her funerary objects; it is also manageable, though, that she was Menkheperre's girl. The God's Wife of Amun in Masaharta's rule looks to have been his sister Maatkare.

The Mummy of Masaharta
Several of his letterings are knew from the Karnak temple of Amenhotep II, from ram-headed sphinxes as well in Karnak, and a important falcon statue.

Masaharta was trusted for the renovation of the mummy of Amenhotep I in the 16th regnal year of Smendes. He is besides named in Theban Graffito no. 1572, from a year 16, in concert with the King's Scribe in the Place of Truth (= Scribe of the Necropolis) Ankhefenamun, the son of King's Scribe Butehamun.

His highest old year is a year 18. It is sometimes gained from the combining of two letters found in el-Hiba, the first mentioning an untitled Masaharta praying for his health, and the second a letter of thanks to the localized god by the full Priest Menkheperre, that Masaharta died of malady at el-Hiba about the 24th regnal year of Smendes, but this is no more than an on trial hypothesis. In fact, it has been direct out that such a scenario ill suits the content of the missives. His mummy was saw in the Deir el-Bahri cache along with different family members; it is now in Luxor. It is often assumed that he was won as higher priest by his brother Djedkhonsuefankh, who served only for a close time and was was by another brother, Menkheperre. However, the position of Djedkhonsuefankh is not beyond dispute. full we really know of his being is the bare credit of his name on the coffin of his son (now lost). There it reads, checking to Torr: "[...]re, son of the first prophet of Amun, Djed-Khons-ef-ankh, son of the Lord of the Two Lands, Pinedjem, Favorite of Amun, first prophet of Amun", with the name Pinedjem introduced in a cartouche.

Djed khonsuefankh is suspicious to have been come as higher Priest by his brother Menkheperre, which seems to imply that his son "[...]re" either predeceased him, was too young to succeed or was simply passed over for other grounds. However, Andrzej Niwi ski  has evoked that Djedkhonsuefankh was not the son of Pinedjem I, but rather of Pinedjem II, and as untold the essential grandson of Pinedjem I Niwi?ski keys him with the main formal mentioned with the burials of Neskhons in year 5 of king Siamun and of Pinedjem II in year 10 of the very king. He postulates that Psusennes II (in this worthy his brother), who plausibly come after his father Pinedjem II as upper Priest and was in uniting this title with that of king had Djed-Khons-ef-ankh act as his surrogate in Thebes. The title of upper Priest on his coffin would then be given posthumously by his son "[...]re" Niwi?ski likewise heads out that theophoric names as Djed-Khons-ef-ankh mainly appear very late in the 21st Dynasty. If we discount the ephemeral Djedkhonsuefankh, it seems that Masaharta was won by his brother Menkheperre.

Recent Posts:



·        Kenbet
·        Marriage in Ancient Egypt
·        Love in Ancient Egypt
·        kenken-ur
·        Nebireyeraw
·        Avaris
·        Admonitions of Ipuwer
·        Keper

Labels